My Dear Friends, we have given our site a new look and upgraded its features. Now it’s even easier to use and better than ever. You’ll enjoy using it more than any other site!
A-Z INDEX
Mary Reilly (1996)
×
Movie | Mary Reilly (1996) |
Real Title | Mary Reilly |
Rating | 5.8 |
Duration | 104 Min |
Aired | 1996-02-23 |
Languages | HINDI-ENGLISH |
Subtitle | Esub |
Quality | Bluray |
Sources | IMDB | TMDB |
Countries
United States of America, United Kingdom
Genres
DramaHorrorThrillerHollywood Movies Hindi DubbedHindi Dubbed MoviesDual AudioBritish MoviesEnglish MoviesHollywood Movies
Tags
Directors
Stephen Frears
Stars
Julia Roberts, John Malkovich, George Cole, Michael Gambon, Glenn Close, Kathy Staff
Writers
Christopher Hampton
Companies
NFH Films, TriStar Pictures
Taglines
Taglines: The untold story of Jekyll and Hyde
Description
A housemaid falls in love with Dr. Jekyll and his darkly mysterious counterpart, Mr. Hyde.
Reviews:
Author: tmdb28039023Did we really need a secondhand retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson's classic tale as seen through the eyes of the eponymous, non-canonical housemaid? This is such a well-known story that adding a fresh perspective may have seemed like a good idea at the time; on the other hand, what possible insight could Mary (Julia Roberts) offer when she’s either blind as a bat or dumb as a rock? She’s not alone, though; everyone in this movie who isn’t Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde suffers from Lois Lane Syndrome. The closest anyone ever comes to pointing out the uncanny resemblance between the "master" and his "assistant" is remarking that "they do look a bit alike." More like a yottabit. John Malkovich could have been as good an Edward Hyde as we was a Vicomte Valmont, and that’s precisely what made him wrong for the Henry Jekyll part. Casting him in both roles not only completely misses the original novel’s Apollonian/Dionysian dichotomy theme, but also makes the rest of the characters, especially the heroine, like complete morons. And since everyone in the audience knows, if they know nothing else, that Jekyll and Hyde are one and the same, what the hell was the point anyway?